home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
092192
/
09219915.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-02-26
|
2KB
|
50 lines
<text id=92TT2087>
<title>
Sep. 21, 1992: Play of the Week
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
Sep. 21, 1992 Hollywood & Politics
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
THE WEEK
SOCIETY, Page 21
Play of the Week
</hdr><body>
<p>A jury leaves N.F.L. players licking their chops, owners their
wounds
</p>
<p> In the relentless struggle between athletes and team owners for
a bigger slice of professional sports' financial pie, control of
free agency has been the utensil of choice. Last week,
following a 36-day trial, a federal court dropped the owners'
favorite fork on the floor, ruling that the National Football
League's limited free-agency plan was illegal and awarding four
players $1.6 million in damages. The decision will probably lead
to a less restrictive agreement and higher salaries.
</p>
<p> Players contended that the existing plan kept salaries low
and curtailed their ability to move freely to higher-paying
teams; the owners argued that fewer restrictions would unleash
uncontrolled salary escalation. On this last point, both sides
might agree; in the National Basketball Association and
major-league baseball, free agency is looser. Annual player
salaries average $1.1 million and $1.08 million, respectively.
In the N.F.L., the average is about $400,000. Probably not for
long.
</p>
<p> The plaintiff's suit included a total of eight athletes,
but according to Tom Condon, a sports agent and former head of
the N.F.L. Player's Association, some 1,000 of the N.F.L.'s
1,500 players have been affected by the old free-agency rule,
which has been in effect since 1989. The players' attorney,
Jeffrey Kessler, called the decision a "total victory." The
N.F.L. said it would appeal.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>